20230921

A little longer about the quantum. Spin as a angular momentum. An attempt to imagine a spin as a rotation in a spatial plane was unsuccessful. Either the top – light speed was required ( “pi” * “c” ) or it was required to reduce the radius of rotation ( by “pi” times). But there is no need in the first or in the second if there is a plane with single dimensions smaller spatial in “pi” once. It is. This is a plane formed by the time multiplied by the “c” – fundamental speed, and the radius of the 5-sphere. In space, the angular momentum is always perpendicular to the plane of rotation ( conditionally up or down ). The quantum spin as a angular momentum
should also be directed perpendicular. Like Buridan’s ass, standing between the two identical piles of hay and did not choose any of them, the spin of the resting particle cannot choose any of the three equivalent spatial directions. And only when one of the spatial directions begins to differ from the other two directions, which is called quantum physics and not only. The simplest application of the back as a constant physical value for the particle is the movement of the material body in space-time. Adding an energy/linear momentum to particle means a reduction in the longitudinal direction of size and time. In the transverse direction of
adding energy/impoers there is no. This means that neither the dimensions nor the time are reduced. This is both bad and good. It is bad because the special theory of relativity, which dominant in science for more than century, was wrong in terms of relativistic slowdown in time. It is good because it makes it possible to massive particles (including classic starships) moving at a speed, equivalent to the larger square root of two, to reach the final point earlier than radiation. In addition, this opens up an opportunity for interstellar communication with ping not in tens of years but in tens of hours..
I consider it necessary to correct my oversight and bring to apologize:
Earlier in the message 20220315/02 it was said that the Vimanasnextday has a drawback – the lack of relativistic reduction of time. It is not right. The Vimanasnextday has a relativist’s contraction, but it is slightly with
interplanetary flights

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *