20260329

Сообщение о гравитации здесь появится через несколько дней, всем вам придётся подождать

Four weeks have passed, thank you all for your understanding and anticipation….

The Solvay Conference of 1927. A place where and when something related to relativism, gravity, and cosmology hadn’t changed, but could have. A place where almost all the attention of 30 outstanding scientists was absorbed by the squabble between Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. Just five days, and practically every participant at the Solvay Conference of 1927 was in their element. The understanding had not yet dawned that scientific discoveries are not just for fun, but a solid foundation for states to achieve fatal dominance. This time would arrive only in fifteen years, and would lead to a situation where even fundamental and quasi-fundamental research would be very well funded, and in some fields, knowledge would become a factor in national security. But let’s return to the 20th century. The only means of communication are interpersonal post-mail correspondence and publications in a few journals, with no internet or preprints. It is precisely to this state of science that cosmology owes its long-standing, almost complete neglect. As I wrote in previous posts, in 1917 and 1922, Einstein and Friedmann adopted a time coordinate shorter than each of the spatial coordinates by exactly pi (3.14…) times. What, it would seem, is the significance of this knowledge for quantum physics? Quantum physics has a concept of quantum spin – an intrinsic form of angular momentum (or rotational momentum) carried by elementary particles. Why an intrinsic form? Because rotating a segment equal to the reduced Compton length of any particle by 180 or 360 degrees requires either a velocity greater than the speed of light in a vacuum or a longer time, and this “longer” is strictly equal to pi (3.14…). In other words, quantum spin cannot be explained by rotation in the plane of any two spatial dimensions. If we assume that rotation occurs in both the time and one of the spatial dimensions, the result is better – either a speed greater than the speed of light in a vacuum or a longer time is required, and this “longer” is equal to 2.33…. But the result remains qualitatively the same. It only remains to assume the existence of another, not spacelike, but timelike dimension (not secondary time). And, accordingly, rotation in the plane of the time dimension and a timelike dimension of equal “length” to it. In this case, at first glance, the result is the same as for the case of rotation in the plane of spatial dimensions. At second glance, the ratio of the particle’s lengths determines the inverse ratio of energies, that is, the time dimension contains pi (3.14…) times more energy than the spatial dimension. Since the quantum spin of a particle is a constant, independent of velocity, gravity, or the time of its formation, an increase in energy by a factor of pi (3.14…) means a decrease in the orbital time (k is the conversion factor for LMT to Planck units).

    \[\quicklatex\boxed{ k \sqrt \frac{\hbar c^5}{G} \cdot \pi/k \sqrt \frac{\hbar G}{c^5} =h/2= \pi k \sqrt \frac{\hbar c^5}{G} \cdot 1/k \sqrt \frac{\hbar G}{c^5} }\]

Okay, let’s say rotation is possible in the plane of “short” (non-spatial) dimensions and it really exists. Let it change our understanding of quantum physics. Let it explain, with an accuracy of a hundredth of a percent, what Dark Matter and Dark Energy are. Yes, yes, in 1927, astrophysicists didn’t yet know what Dark Matter and Dark Energy were. If they had found out later, they would have called them differently. It was 1927, and the obvious question about the inverse square dependence of gravity on distance would have been asked. Gravity decreases as 1/r^2 because it is a force radiating from a point source into three-dimensional space, adhering to geometric principles. As distance (r) increases, the gravitational influence spreads over a sphere’s surface, which grows proportionally to r^2. Less often, the physical dimension of Newton’s gravitational constant would be cited as an argument. As early as 1915, in Einstein’s kappa constant, the physical dimension ceased to refer to three-dimensional space.

    \[\quicklatex\boxed{ G=\kappa \frac{c^2}{8\pi}=\frac{l_p}{m_p} \cdot \frac{c^2}{8\pi}}\]

It took another half-century to prove that gravitational interaction is independent of the spatial dimension, and in addition to the distance and masses of gravitating objects, it also depends on the total energy. It took some time to demonstrate another difference between gravity and electromagnetism: the superadditivity of gravity. In addition to fundamental changes in cosmology, this also led to the possibility of creating different types of gravitational engines for Vimanas Nextday.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *